Start with a household cost, a work decision, a claim in a group chat, or an evaluation from a community project. Each tool checks a different kind of reasoning. You can write your own case in Bahasa Indonesia or English; the report follows its language.
These case descriptions are fictional. The review points are an editorial preview, not a live audit report or a claim about a real person, organization, or city. Your report depends on the evidence you submit and the audit intensity you choose.
Our monthly take-home income is Rp 8,000,000. Rent and utilities cost Rp 2,900,000; food and transport cost Rp 1,800,000; existing installments are Rp 500,000; other essentials are about Rp 1,000,000. A motorcycle would add a Rp 1,200,000 monthly installment. We think we can manage because our income has been stable. This estimate does not include the motorcycle's fuel, maintenance, insurance, or registration.
What this debugger should examine
·Check the monthly remainder: Rp 600,000 before motorcycle running costs.
·Stress-test a 10% income drop, which would put this estimate about Rp 200,000 below zero.
·Ask whether savings, irregular costs, and the full ownership cost are included.
I have a stable job that pays Rp 8,000,000 per month. A small startup has offered Rp 10,000,000, but the offer letter does not yet explain probation, health benefits, or what happens if the role ends. I help support a parent each month. The startup says it has enough funding, but I have not seen details. I need to decide before my current employer's notice deadline next Friday.
What this debugger should examine
·Compare total compensation and employment terms, not salary alone.
·Identify what funding evidence and family obligations change the downside.
·Set a decision deadline and fallback plan around the notice period.
A post shared in my neighborhood group says: “Private cars will be banned across the city by 2030.” It mentions a transport plan but gives no document link, date, district, or quote from an official. Several people are sharing it as a confirmed decision. Please check whether this statement is supported and what is still unknown.
What this debugger should examine
·Find the earliest source and distinguish an adopted policy from a proposal.
·Check which locations, vehicles, and dates the source actually covers.
·Keep the claim unresolved until a relevant, current official source is verified.
A neighborhood group ran a weekend reading club for children aged 8–10. At the end of the program, 18 of the 24 families who attended at least once said their child enjoyed reading more. We want to conclude that the club improved reading skills and apply for funding to expand it. We did not test reading skills before or after the program, and families who stopped attending were not surveyed.
What this debugger should examine
·Separate reported enjoyment from measured reading improvement.
·Check how attendance and missing responses affect the conclusion.
·Match the funding claim to what this small evaluation can support.
